pharmaceutical studies, you should consciously deceive S. Schneider
studies funded by pharmaceutical companies fall been more positive than
studies from independent sources. The company can know every trick, umfrisieren how unpleasant results, or swept under the carpet. A study of two American researchers Paul M. Ridker and Jose Torres of Harvard Medical School in Boston does away with the mistaken belief that studies of drugs
bold and are above suspicion. They analyzed 324 clinical studies
a new heart and circulatory
medium from the years 2000-2005, reports on the renowned in the medical journals, "JAMA, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine" was
your results. Nearly 70 percent of the studies by authors who were paid by the pharmaceutical industry fell, positive about. 33 percent were neutral or argued for the traditional treatment measures saw In independent studies it like this:.. 49 percent of the authors judged positively, 51 percent negative, or neutral view of the industry in general after negative
study results no further investigations funded, it looks mau connection with contracts for researchers. If the results is positive, , new series of tests undertaken. The science is under pressure, prompting them to distort results.
Note: Gigantic fraud expires with
swine flu vaccination .
The same gigantic fraud
take the chemical
skin preparations instead
ENT poisoning for / against
ENT giftungsOrgan skin
Phsychopharmaka already about 60 years and more
! LG
--------------------------------------------- ------------------
Guaranteed quality of life:
No matter what we say, you want to change anything? Our
solution, even if you do not immediately understand ... is simply to order the toothbrush / Lotion
(
new! ) and additional info at
Job Health Leisure and request assistance from us!
